Level of Consciousness Forum Index Kinesiology and Level of Consciousness David Deangelo Calibration
|
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic |
|
| |
|
|
|---|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #32 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Spiritual Disciple
![]()
Joined: 2009/7/31
From
Posts: 94
![]() |
hmm.. i think the answer has been given on this thread before.. (check up the statements about intention)
i for myself found, that love and truth are the most powerful ingredients for the fulfilment of human relationships.. when you "practice" love and truth you are not dependent on dates as a upvaluation of yourself anymore.. and when your behaviour embodies love and truth (wich seems to be the only way to respect and appreciate the nature of a woman (human beeing in general) - from my point of view) there is no necessity for seduction at all.. love is that strong that you can exclusevely loose when you seduce somebody.. (i have not met one person that was not touched by true love..ok, this does not mean that you end up in bed with them.. haahaahaa..)do not take it as an offense.. but when truth speaks for itself then seducement can only be a lack of truth, isn“t it? there seem to be two options.. you can align yourself with love and surrender your need to have a mate. this will invite the highest will and you may meet a lovely woman that has the potential to help you with your personal and karmic issues of this lifetime... ..or you choose to follow pride and desire.. then bear in mind that a person that is attracted by the essence of seduction embodies the same.. ..its a question of choice. its a question of what you want.. kind regards, robin |
||
Posted on: 2009/9/1 5:42
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #33 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2009/1/25
From
Posts: 199
![]() |
Quote:
To me, that kind of dichotomy parallels that presented in ACIM: no hierarchy of miracles, yes, but for practical purposes there seems to be a gradation. Without much scientific precision, there may be relationships of levels 200-499 which can be described well exclusively neither by love nor lust. |
||
Posted on: 2009/9/1 7:21
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #34 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Spiritual Disciple
![]()
Joined: 2009/7/31
From
Posts: 94
![]() |
yes, vonBock.. it seems expedient that there are relationships that calibrate between 200-499. otherwise the potentiality of relationships to help you to learn different lessons and to work on karmic remainders would be derogated.. especial partnerships seem to be appropriate to develop forgiveness, faithfulness, heartiness andverymuchmore..
i guess the reason you mentioned the range between 200 and 499 is because of my reference to "love".. i think that love is active in human relationships to a certain degree.. (assuredly not in all of them..) as an example..you might say that forgiveness is an "gradation" of love.. i guess that my thoughts about the two options rather were pointing to the "entrance-door" that i use...or to my own inner intention in that process.. in the second case you search for someone and you may even need a relationship. trapped in that urge you will seduce a wanted person more likely.. known or unknown you will force something.. in the first case you do not need a partnership nor do you force one. in fact you become a partner when the circumstances lead to this, when the potentiality of the situation invites you.. but you do not resist your former or actual situation.. do you want to take, do you want to give or dou you want to allow both..? all in all i do not want to say that there are no positive calibrating relationships that began when the field(s) of desire met eachother/itself.. but as long as you are aware of you own actions it seems to be a matter of intention.. |
||
Posted on: 2009/9/1 9:46
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #35 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Spiritual Warrior
![]()
Joined: 2010/1/4
From
Posts: 15
![]() |
!!!cud some1 calibrate "alc"s post and his loc at the time of posting.(his post is on the previous page) I suspect slander and non integrous distortion of truth.
((Mod Note: We do not post unsolicited calibrations of other forum members in these forums. Please see my post below. This note is included in this post only to preempt response. - Tim)) The thing missed by the community is discernment. Picking up a non integrous girl, with the LOC of a wolf, is a tempory victory for the blind, who are later ripped to sheds for their mistake/sin. joe |
||
Posted on: 2010/1/20 16:40
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #36 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]()
Joined: 2006/2/5
From D.C. Suburbs
Posts: 1257
![]() |
Quote:
To add to the note I popped into the post (no text of the original post was removed or edited)... Even calibrations for material posted by other members should only be posted with some wisdom and discernment unless solicited. The primary reasons for this would be that each of us has varying degrees of kinesiological ability, accuracy or "in tune-ness." The same may be said for ability to hold off on calibrations until a balanced and impartial mindset is present. With varying degrees of the above, to begin a trend of posting calibrations of each others' posts might not be as good of an idea as it sounds. When emotions are heated, that sort of precedent could spin out of control and even when things aren't heated, varying degrees of accuracy could bring about pretty uncomfortable situations when we're dealing with others in the forum. For example: If someone reads your post and gets a feel that there's a negativity to it, then calibrates it without setting themselves to an impartial mindset and gets a low number based on poor mental and physical technique... and then posts it. Well, some in here would take it as gospel truth since kineseology is supposed to be very accurate. Right??? It sets the stage for too much bad juju. There are times when error works its way into the site and not every poster historically has calibrated over 200 (though below is rare). The alternate route is to discuss the material in order to draw out anything that doesn't seem quite right about the truth of the material. Calibrating posts personally for personal reference is encouraged, if one has the ability, of course! Certainly the search for truth and devlopment of any ability toward discernment is part of spiritual evolution and what this site is about. Thanks, Tim |
||
Posted on: 2010/1/20 17:50
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #37 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Spiritual Disciple
![]()
Joined: 2009/8/29
From
Posts: 68
![]() |
While this topic is fresh.
I looked into "Mind Power Seduction" by Amargi Hillier and got the following: Main Method: Using Law of Attraction / Visualisation to Seduce Women - 190 Support Method: Improving self in non-seduction areas (such as Developing Career, Practising a new sport / hobby, learning new skills, etc.) - 325 Advice regarding seduction / attraction: These are actual real pieces of advice. Even the ridicious sounding ones! STRONG "Be yourself" "Have fun with life" "Develop yourself" "Hobbies keep your mind clean and your hands busy!" WEAK "Talk to women" (With purpose of sleeping with them) "Women are attracted to the Alpha Male. Be the Alpha Male" "Hold yourself as dominant and never say 'Sorry'" "Be tough" "Choose a guy you could easily bash and beat them and women will find you attractive" "Get penis enlargement" "Drink alcohol and women will think you are cool" "Women like guys who sleep around. Pretend you sleep with women everyday and make them jealous" "Women love money. Buy lots of rings, watches, expensive suits and wear them everywhere you go" "Buy a muscle car and get it 'pimped out'" "Break up the relationship and sleep with the girl. The guy involved is a loser anyway" |
||
Posted on: 2010/1/20 18:22
|
|||
|
Re: David Deangelo Calibration | #38 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2009/5/6
From
Posts: 228
![]() |
Quote:
I'm not in the PUA business, nor am I any longer involved in the "community" so I got nothing lose or gain by that post. What I am is; a little bit leary about someone saying they calibrate at 500, 600, or even 700 (heck 400 is already high) without the respective attractor or etheric fields manifested to correspond with such a calibration. Besides I seriously doubt anyone who calibrates at such high levels will feel the need to announce it, the etheric fields will do the work for them without them having to puff themselves up. I posted that to make people aware that calibrations can be mis-used for personal ends of the ego. Anybody can say they calibrate highly, I want to make sure before I take their word for it. If you want to take them at face value without anything to show for it, you go ahead that's up to you, you're free to do so. If his teaching helps you well that's great, but you should at least know the line between truth and bogus claims. |
||
Posted on: 2010/1/27 21:40
|
|||
Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
|
|
Topic options
Print Topic
Threaded
Newest First
MasterEnki



haahaahaa..)


You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.